Silicon Valley Sleuth, an insider's view from Silicon Valley
A blog from vnunet.com



Other blogs
PCW Inter@ctive
Your views, your comments, your say

Security Watchdog
Sniffing out IT security
issues

The test bed
The hottest products, news and gossip from PCW's
Labs.

IT Sneak
IT Sneak Blog rummages in the dustbin of IT events.

Backbytes
An irreverent and offbeat look at the lighter side of technology

InterActive Home
Your complete guide to home entertainment technology

Taking Stock
Gags and Gossip from Accountancy Age.

Gizmodo
The gadgets weblog.



« San Andreas vice | Main | And so Cisco's IOS nightmare continues »

IOS controversy: could blogs and news websites be next?

The story of Michael Lynn standing up to the big and mighty Cisco remains to be intriguing.

Having just read the legal document that Cisco and ISS filed, it becomes clear just how serious Cisco is taking this.

To read the background information on what exactly happened, read this posting, or this news story.

In summary: Lynn showed how he could take a Cisco router offline at the Black Hat security conference. But his employer ISS and Cisco didn't want him to give that presentation. Lynn quit his job, ISS and Cisco filed a lawsuit hoping to make him shut up. Lynn (rightfully) wet his pants and agreeded to the injunction.

Cisco was holding a legal trump card: by reverse engineering the IOS software that runs Cisco's routers, Lynn violated the vendor's copyrights.

The injunction demands that Lynn presents a list of people who have 1) received written or electronic information about the presentation (this excludes people who heard him give the presentation); 2)  received information about Cisco's code during Lynn's research; 3) a list of websites where Lynn directedly or indirectly posted information about the presentation or Cisco code, or websites where he is aware such information is disclosed.

In other words: any blogger that took notes and posted too much detail about how Lynn's attack worked can expect a phone call from the Cisco and ISS lawyers, demanding that they remove the information.

Because Cisco effectively says that all information from the presentation is the result of a copyright violation, the company would have a decent shot at succeeding.

But does that solve the security issue?

327933_8451

Photo credit:  Syam Hassan

Tags: cisco, ios, black hat, michael lynn, iss 

July 29, 2005 at 01:21 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/24766/2903286

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference IOS controversy: could blogs and news websites be next?:

Comments

Post a comment






 

Useful links: About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions | Top of the page
© Incisive Media Ltd. 2008
Incisive Media Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, is a company registered in the United Kingdom with company registration number 04038503